Crime and Memory
نویسندگان
چکیده
The conflict between knowing and not knowing, speech and silence, remembering and forgetting, is the central dialectic of psychological trauma. This conflict is manifest in the individual disturbances of memory, the amnesias and hypermnesias, of traumatized people. It is manifest also on a social level, in persisting debates over the historical reality of atrocities that have been documented beyond any reasonable doubt. Social controversy becomes particularly acute at moments in history when perpetrators face the prospect of being publicly exposed or held legally accountable for crimes long hidden or condoned. This situation obtains in many countries emerging from dictatorship, with respect to political crimes such as murder and torture. It obtains in this country with regard to the private crimes of sexual and domestic violence. This article examines a current public controversy, regarding the credibility of adult recall of childhood abuse, as a classic example of the dialectic of trauma.
منابع مشابه
A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Another post with A Case Study Of Eyewitness Memory Of A Crime : a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime duljc a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime kqhpb a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime nsctd a case study of eyewitness memory of a crime leykw 10 u eyewitness testimony somsd.k12.nj eyewitness memory of a supermarket robbery: a case study eyewitness memory for vehicles m...
متن کاملModelling the fear of crime
How secure people feel in a particular region is obviously linked to the actual crime suffered in that region but the exact relationship between crime and its fear is quite subtle. Two regions may have the same crime rate but their local perception of security may differ. Equally, two places may have the same perception of security even though one may have a significantly lower crime rate. Furt...
متن کاملDetecting malingered memory problems in the civil and criminal arena
Feigning a psychiatric or neurological disorder may be an attractive strategy to obtain all sorts of privileges or disability benefits. In the criminal arena, feigning memory loss for a crime (crime-related amnesia) may be a way for defendants to gain sympathy or to promote a diminished capacity defence. Although crime-related amnesia may, under some circumstances, be genuine, in many cases it ...
متن کاملConstructing rich false memories of committing crime.
Memory researchers long have speculated that certain tactics may lead people to recall crimes that never occurred, and thus could potentially lead to false confessions. This is the first study to provide evidence suggesting that full episodic false memories of committing crime can be generated in a controlled experimental setting. With suggestive memory-retrieval techniques, participants were i...
متن کاملRunning head: ATTRIBUTION OF CRIME MOTIVES Attribution of Crime Motives biases Eyewitnesses’ Memory and Sentencing Decisions
In court, the basic expectation is that eyewitness accounts are solely based on what the witness saw. Research on post-event influences has shown that this is not always the case and memory distortions are quite common. However, potential effects of an eyewitness’ attributions regarding a perpetrator’s crime motives have been widely neglected in this domain. In this paper, we present two experi...
متن کاملMetaphor and Memory: How Metaphors Instantiate Schemas in and Influence Memory of Narrative
Metaphoric frames are prominently featured in public discourse. They highlight certain aspects of the target issues they are used to describe, thereby encouraging specific patterns of inference. Our goal was to test whether they would influence memory as well. Building off prior work, we contrasted two metaphors for crime: virus and beast. In a pilot study, we identified specific causes, exampl...
متن کامل